Which wireless encryption algorithm should never be used in modern WLANs?

Which wireless encryption algorithm should never be used in modern WLANs?

• A. Wired equivalent privacy (WEP).
• B. Wireless fidelity protected access (WPA).
• C. WPA2.
• D. WPA3.

Answer: (A)

Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) is a security protocol that was designed to provide a wireless local area network (WLAN) with a level of security and privacy comparable to what is usually expected of a wired LAN. However, over time, serious vulnerabilities have been identified in WEP that compromise its effectiveness in protecting wireless communications. The primary weakness of WEP lies in its use of static encryption keys, which can be easily cracked by attackers. Encryption algorithms that rely on a small number of bits for security, like those employed by WEP (typically 40 or 104 bits), do not provide sufficient protection against modern hacking techniques. This has led to vulnerability exploits that allow unauthorized users to access a network disguised as legitimate devices. In contrast, other options like WPA, WPA2, and WPA3 use more robust encryption standards and methods, such as dynamic key generation and stronger encryption algorithms (like AES), which address the shortcomings of WEP. WPA2 and WPA3 include advancements such as improved security protocols and the use of stronger encryption mechanisms that are crucial for the secure operation of modern WLANs. For these reasons, WEP is considered obsolete and should never be used in contemporary wireless networks, making it the correct answer in this context.

Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) is a security protocol that was designed to provide a wireless local area network (WLAN) with a level of security and privacy comparable to what is usually expected of a wired LAN. However, over time, serious vulnerabilities have been identified in WEP that compromise its effectiveness in protecting wireless communications.

The primary weakness of WEP lies in its use of static encryption keys, which can be easily cracked by attackers. Encryption algorithms that rely on a small number of bits for security, like those employed by WEP (typically 40 or 104 bits), do not provide sufficient protection against modern hacking techniques. This has led to vulnerability exploits that allow unauthorized users to access a network disguised as legitimate devices.

In contrast, other options like WPA, WPA2, and WPA3 use more robust encryption standards and methods, such as dynamic key generation and stronger encryption algorithms (like AES), which address the shortcomings of WEP. WPA2 and WPA3 include advancements such as improved security protocols and the use of stronger encryption mechanisms that are crucial for the secure operation of modern WLANs.

For these reasons, WEP is considered obsolete and should never be used in contemporary wireless networks, making it the correct answer in this context.